Luke Harding is the author of "Invasion" best-seller and the case of ambivalence below:

“Western nations agreed on the nature of the invasion. There was no dispute about what happened in spring 2022 and what it fundamentally meant. As Zelensky said, this was not a war waged by Russia against only Ukraine. It was ultimately a war for the future of the world order and for the right to dictate conditions in Europe. A war, then, of ideas.” [Harding, 2022: 151]

As simple as that!

 A wonderful little piece of “clear” language involving:

1. Simple introductory: “Western nations agreed on the nature of the invasion”,

2. False assumption: “No dispute|”,

3. Pompous hyperbole: “a war for the future of the world order”,

4. Diagnosis of the event as clear as day: “invasion”,

5. False equivalence: “the world order” – “conditions in Europe”,

6. Freudian slip of the tongue: “the right to dictate”,

7. Allusion to the prestigious status: “Zelensky”.