Среда, 27.11.2024, 10:50
Главная Регистрация RSS
Приветствую Вас, Гость
Категории раздела
Последние новости [16]
Полезная и актуальная информация
Translatology [125]
Актуальные вопросы переводоведения The acute problems of translatology
Linguistics [88]
Language peculiarities of the text Языковые особенности текста
Stylistics [121]
Stylistic and pragmatic peculiarities of the text Стилистические и прагматические особенности текста
Мини-чат
200
English at Work


Вход на сайт
Поиск
Tegs
At University
Календарь
«  Январь 2022  »
ПнВтСрЧтПтСбВс
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
Статистика

14:39
Was Horne’s ‘clarification’ the right interpretation of Biden’s ambiguous statement?
Biden wrapped up a marathon news conference, in which he said Russia would be held “accountable” for invading — though he added that the U.S. response would depend on the nature of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s actions. National Security Council spokesperson Emily Horne took to Twitter during the news conference to clarify that Biden was talking about the difference between “military and non-military/para-military/cyber action by the Russians.” “Russia will be held accountable if it invades, and it depends on what it does,” Biden said, when asked how he would hold Russia accountable for an invasion. “It’s one thing if it’s a minor incursion, and then we end up having a fight about what to do and not do, et cetera. But if they actually do what they’re capable of doing with the force amassed on the border, it is going to be a disaster for Russia.”
Категория: Linguistics | Просмотров: 213 | Добавил: Voats | Рейтинг: 0.0/0
Всего комментариев: 0
avatar